abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
BYPZMHQLCFKOXDJUTGERAVSIWN
Why did some tech companies soar during the past decade, 2000 through 2009, while others floundered? The winners--Apple, Google and Salesforce.com, for instance--had the foresight to invent new, profitable sectors (digital media devices and services, Internet advertising, software-as-a-service). The less fortunate--AOL, Dell and Sun, for instance--got distracted or guessed wrong on major trends. Here's our take on the decade's winners and losers in technology.It's easy to fawn over Apple. Let's not. Apple's products aren't cheap. Its employees are secretive about upcoming products. And Apple has done a terrible job of communicating the health status of rock star Chief Executive Steve Jobs, who took a mysterious six-month leave of absence last January only to resurface with a liver transplant in June. None of that, however, really matters. Over the past 10 years Apple's stock has risen more than 650%. Its employee head count rose to 32,000 last year from 8,568 in September of 2000. Apple routinely tops the PC category of the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Finally, Jobs' absence proved he has built a team that can deliver good results--if not detailed updates about his health
SLW ZCZ EJXM RMPL PJXUBDCME EJBG ZAGCDQ RLM UBER ZMPBZM, 2000 RLGJAQL 2009, SLCOM JRLMGE HOJADZMGMZ? RLM SCDDMGE--BUUOM, QJJQOM BDZ EBOMEHJGPM.PJX, HJG CDERBDPM--LBZ RLM HJGMECQLR RJ CDVMDR DMS, UGJHCRBYOM EMPRJGE (ZCQCRBO XMZCB ZMVCPME BDZ EMGVCPME, CDRMGDMR BZVMGRCECDQ, EJHRSBGM-BE-B-EMGVCPM). RLM OMEE HJGRADBRM--BJO, ZMOO BDZ EAD, HJG CDERBDPM--QJR ZCERGBPRMZ JG QAMEEMZ SGJDQ JD XBFJG RGMDZE. LMGM'E JAG RBKM JD RLM ZMPBZM'E SCDDMGE BDZ OJEMGE CD RMPLDJOJQW.CR'E MBEW RJ HBSD JVMG BUUOM. OMR'E DJR. BUUOM'E UGJZAPRE BGMD'R PLMBU. CRE MXUOJWMME BGM EMPGMRCVM BYJAR AUPJXCDQ UGJZAPRE. BDZ BUUOM LBE ZJDM B RMGGCYOM FJY JH PJXXADCPBRCDQ RLM LMBORL ERBRAE JH GJPK ERBG PLCMH MIMPARCVM ERMVM FJYE, SLJ RJJK B XWERMGCJAE ECI-XJDRL OMBVM JH BYEMDPM OBER FBDABGW JDOW RJ GMEAGHBPM SCRL B OCVMG RGBDEUOBDR CD FADM. DJDM JH RLBR, LJSMVMG, GMBOOW XBRRMGE. JVMG RLM UBER 10 WMBGE BUUOM'E ERJPK LBE GCEMD XJGM RLBD 650%. CRE MXUOJWMM LMBZ PJADR GJEM RJ 32,000 OBER WMBG HGJX 8,568 CD EMURMXYMG JH 2000. BUUOM GJARCDMOW RJUE RLM UP PBRMQJGW JH RLM BXMGCPBD PAERJXMG EBRCEHBPRCJD CDZMI. HCDBOOW, FJYE' BYEMDPM UGJVMZ LM LBE YACOR B RMBX RLBR PBD ZMOCVMG QJJZ GMEAORE--CH DJR ZMRBCOMZ AUZBRME BYJAR LCE LMBORL
This table shows the occurances of the letters in the text (ignoring the case of the letters):
This table shows how the text matches a normal probability to text (where 'E' has the highest level of occurance and 'Z' has the least). The grey rows show what would be expected for the order, and the red one shows what your text gives for the order: