[Back] Enter a message, and generate a code:
There have been many problems with software in the past, and applications need to be more robust and provide much better integration with distributed applications. A major problem is that software applications have to interface to many different infrastructures, and it is often to possible to integrate with these in every occasion (Figure 5.1). This chapter outlines the future of software development with the .NET framework, which provides a completely integrated environment and should support applications which are uncrashable, and are portable and inherently secure. The migration towards .NET is likely be slow, though, but the future will be towards an operating environments which provides support for .NET and Java-based programs, and the other types of code being migrated out of the system, as they offer many problems and security weaknesses. Along with this, as has been seen in chapters 3 and 4, there needs to be more stronger support for the authentication of software components, and secure data storage/transmission, in order to enhance security. The authentication, thus, needs to be applied to users, devices and also to software components, where software libraries and components must authenticate themselves properly with hash signatures, and even with digital certificates. In this way, applications can be built using authenticated components. Along with this, authentication allows for the licensing of software components, as only authorized vendors will be allowed to use digitally-signed components. As applications are now increasingly using software components, and libraries, especially ones which could be distributed over networks, the requirement for properly authenticated components is increasing.
IKJNJ KQLJ RJJO FQOP WNBRVJFD CAIK DBZICQNJ AO IKJ WQDI, QOH QWWVAUQIABOD OJJH IB RJ FBNJ NBRTDI QOH WNBLAHJ FTUK RJIIJN AOIJENQIABO CAIK HADINARTIJH QWWVAUQIABOD. Q FQYBN WNBRVJF AD IKQI DBZICQNJ QWWVAUQIABOD KQLJ IB AOIJNZQUJ IB FQOP HAZZJNJOI AOZNQDINTUITNJD, QOH AI AD BZIJO IB WBDDARVJ IB AOIJENQIJ CAIK IKJDJ AO JLJNP BUUQDABO (ZAETNJ 5.1). IKAD UKQWIJN BTIVAOJD IKJ ZTITNJ BZ DBZICQNJ HJLJVBWFJOI CAIK IKJ .OJI ZNQFJCBNG, CKAUK WNBLAHJD Q UBFWVJIJVP AOIJENQIJH JOLANBOFJOI QOH DKBTVH DTWWBNI QWWVAUQIABOD CKAUK QNJ TOUNQDKQRVJ, QOH QNJ WBNIQRVJ QOH AOKJNJOIVP DJUTNJ. IKJ FAENQIABO IBCQNHD .OJI AD VAGJVP RJ DVBC, IKBTEK, RTI IKJ ZTITNJ CAVV RJ IBCQNHD QO BWJNQIAOE JOLANBOFJOID CKAUK WNBLAHJD DTWWBNI ZBN .OJI QOH YQLQ-RQDJH WNBENQFD, QOH IKJ BIKJN IPWJD BZ UBHJ RJAOE FAENQIJH BTI BZ IKJ DPDIJF, QD IKJP BZZJN FQOP WNBRVJFD QOH DJUTNAIP CJQGOJDDJD. QVBOE CAIK IKAD, QD KQD RJJO DJJO AO UKQWIJND 3 QOH 4, IKJNJ OJJHD IB RJ FBNJ DINBOEJN DTWWBNI ZBN IKJ QTIKJOIAUQIABO BZ DBZICQNJ UBFWBOJOID, QOH DJUTNJ HQIQ DIBNQEJ/INQODFADDABO, AO BNHJN IB JOKQOUJ DJUTNAIP. IKJ QTIKJOIAUQIABO, IKTD, OJJHD IB RJ QWWVAJH IB TDJND, HJLAUJD QOH QVDB IB DBZICQNJ UBFWBOJOID, CKJNJ DBZICQNJ VARNQNAJD QOH UBFWBOJOID FTDI QTIKJOIAUQIJ IKJFDJVLJD WNBWJNVP CAIK KQDK DAEOQITNJD, QOH JLJO CAIK HAEAIQV UJNIAZAUQIJD. AO IKAD CQP, QWWVAUQIABOD UQO RJ RTAVI TDAOE QTIKJOIAUQIJH UBFWBOJOID. QVBOE CAIK IKAD, QTIKJOIAUQIABO QVVBCD ZBN IKJ VAUJODAOE BZ DBZICQNJ UBFWBOJOID, QD BOVP QTIKBNASJH LJOHBND CAVV RJ QVVBCJH IB TDJ HAEAIQVVP-DAEOJH UBFWBOJOID. QD QWWVAUQIABOD QNJ OBC AOUNJQDAOEVP TDAOE DBZICQNJ UBFWBOJOID, QOH VARNQNAJD, JDWJUAQVVP BOJD CKAUK UBTVH RJ HADINARTIJH BLJN OJICBNGD, IKJ NJXTANJFJOI ZBN WNBWJNVP QTIKJOIAUQIJH UBFWBOJOID AD AOUNJQDAOE.
This table shows the occurances of the letters in the text (ignoring the case of the letters):
This table shows how the text matches a normal probability to text (where 'E' has the highest level of occurance and 'Z' has the least). The grey rows show what would be expected for the order, and the red one shows what your text gives for the order: