abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
VQDYTEUSPWIBJFNGZXOACHRLMK
There have been many problems with software in the past, and applications need to be more robust and provide much better integration with distributed applications. A major problem is that software applications have to interface to many different infrastructures, and it is often to possible to integrate with these in every occasion (Figure 5.1). This chapter outlines the future of software development with the .NET framework, which provides a completely integrated environment and should support applications which are uncrashable, and are portable and inherently secure. The migration towards .NET is likely be slow, though, but the future will be towards an operating environments which provides support for .NET and Java-based programs, and the other types of code being migrated out of the system, as they offer many problems and security weaknesses. Along with this, as has been seen in chapters 3 and 4, there needs to be more stronger support for the authentication of software components, and secure data storage/transmission, in order to enhance security. The authentication, thus, needs to be applied to users, devices and also to software components, where software libraries and components must authenticate themselves properly with hash signatures, and even with digital certificates. In this way, applications can be built using authenticated components. Along with this, authentication allows for the licensing of software components, as only authorized vendors will be allowed to use digitally-signed components. As applications are now increasingly using software components, and libraries, especially ones which could be distributed over networks, the requirement for properly authenticated components is increasing.
ASTXT SVHT QTTF JVFM GXNQBTJO RPAS ONEARVXT PF AST GVOA, VFY VGGBPDVAPNFO FTTY AN QT JNXT XNQCOA VFY GXNHPYT JCDS QTAATX PFATUXVAPNF RPAS YPOAXPQCATY VGGBPDVAPNFO. V JVWNX GXNQBTJ PO ASVA ONEARVXT VGGBPDVAPNFO SVHT AN PFATXEVDT AN JVFM YPEETXTFA PFEXVOAXCDACXTO, VFY PA PO NEATF AN GNOOPQBT AN PFATUXVAT RPAS ASTOT PF THTXM NDDVOPNF (EPUCXT 5.1). ASPO DSVGATX NCABPFTO AST ECACXT NE ONEARVXT YTHTBNGJTFA RPAS AST .FTA EXVJTRNXI, RSPDS GXNHPYTO V DNJGBTATBM PFATUXVATY TFHPXNFJTFA VFY OSNCBY OCGGNXA VGGBPDVAPNFO RSPDS VXT CFDXVOSVQBT, VFY VXT GNXAVQBT VFY PFSTXTFABM OTDCXT. AST JPUXVAPNF ANRVXYO .FTA PO BPITBM QT OBNR, ASNCUS, QCA AST ECACXT RPBB QT ANRVXYO VF NGTXVAPFU TFHPXNFJTFAO RSPDS GXNHPYTO OCGGNXA ENX .FTA VFY WVHV-QVOTY GXNUXVJO, VFY AST NASTX AMGTO NE DNYT QTPFU JPUXVATY NCA NE AST OMOATJ, VO ASTM NEETX JVFM GXNQBTJO VFY OTDCXPAM RTVIFTOOTO. VBNFU RPAS ASPO, VO SVO QTTF OTTF PF DSVGATXO 3 VFY 4, ASTXT FTTYO AN QT JNXT OAXNFUTX OCGGNXA ENX AST VCASTFAPDVAPNF NE ONEARVXT DNJGNFTFAO, VFY OTDCXT YVAV OANXVUT/AXVFOJPOOPNF, PF NXYTX AN TFSVFDT OTDCXPAM. AST VCASTFAPDVAPNF, ASCO, FTTYO AN QT VGGBPTY AN COTXO, YTHPDTO VFY VBON AN ONEARVXT DNJGNFTFAO, RSTXT ONEARVXT BPQXVXPTO VFY DNJGNFTFAO JCOA VCASTFAPDVAT ASTJOTBHTO GXNGTXBM RPAS SVOS OPUFVACXTO, VFY THTF RPAS YPUPAVB DTXAPEPDVATO. PF ASPO RVM, VGGBPDVAPNFO DVF QT QCPBA COPFU VCASTFAPDVATY DNJGNFTFAO. VBNFU RPAS ASPO, VCASTFAPDVAPNF VBBNRO ENX AST BPDTFOPFU NE ONEARVXT DNJGNFTFAO, VO NFBM VCASNXPKTY HTFYNXO RPBB QT VBBNRTY AN COT YPUPAVBBM-OPUFTY DNJGNFTFAO. VO VGGBPDVAPNFO VXT FNR PFDXTVOPFUBM COPFU ONEARVXT DNJGNFTFAO, VFY BPQXVXPTO, TOGTDPVBBM NFTO RSPDS DNCBY QT YPOAXPQCATY NHTX FTARNXIO, AST XTZCPXTJTFA ENX GXNGTXBM VCASTFAPDVATY DNJGNFTFAO PO PFDXTVOPFU.
This table shows the occurances of the letters in the text (ignoring the case of the letters):
This table shows how the text matches a normal probability to text (where 'E' has the highest level of occurance and 'Z' has the least). The grey rows show what would be expected for the order, and the red one shows what your text gives for the order: