abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
LQYDUFNZOXKSJIHTCRAGPVBMWE
Why did some tech companies soar during the past decade, 2000 through 2009, while others floundered? The winners--Apple, Google and Salesforce.com, for instance--had the foresight to invent new, profitable sectors (digital media devices and services, Internet advertising, software-as-a-service). The less fortunate--AOL, Dell and Sun, for instance--got distracted or guessed wrong on major trends. Here's our take on the decade's winners and losers in technology.It's easy to fawn over Apple. Let's not. Apple's products aren't cheap. Its employees are secretive about upcoming products. And Apple has done a terrible job of communicating the health status of rock star Chief Executive Steve Jobs, who took a mysterious six-month leave of absence last January only to resurface with a liver transplant in June. None of that, however, really matters. Over the past 10 years Apple's stock has risen more than 650%. Its employee head count rose to 32,000 last year from 8,568 in September of 2000. Apple routinely tops the PC category of the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Finally, Jobs' absence proved he has built a team that can deliver good results--if not detailed updates about his health
BZW DOD AHJU GUYZ YHJTLIOUA AHLR DPROIN GZU TLAG DUYLDU, 2000 GZRHPNZ 2009, BZOSU HGZURA FSHPIDURUD? GZU BOIIURA--LTTSU, NHHNSU LID ALSUAFHRYU.YHJ, FHR OIAGLIYU--ZLD GZU FHRUAONZG GH OIVUIG IUB, TRHFOGLQSU AUYGHRA (DONOGLS JUDOL DUVOYUA LID AURVOYUA, OIGURIUG LDVURGOAOIN, AHFGBLRU-LA-L-AURVOYU). GZU SUAA FHRGPILGU--LHS, DUSS LID API, FHR OIAGLIYU--NHG DOAGRLYGUD HR NPUAAUD BRHIN HI JLXHR GRUIDA. ZURU'A HPR GLKU HI GZU DUYLDU'A BOIIURA LID SHAURA OI GUYZIHSHNW.OG'A ULAW GH FLBI HVUR LTTSU. SUG'A IHG. LTTSU'A TRHDPYGA LRUI'G YZULT. OGA UJTSHWUUA LRU AUYRUGOVU LQHPG PTYHJOIN TRHDPYGA. LID LTTSU ZLA DHIU L GURROQSU XHQ HF YHJJPIOYLGOIN GZU ZULSGZ AGLGPA HF RHYK AGLR YZOUF UMUYPGOVU AGUVU XHQA, BZH GHHK L JWAGUROHPA AOM-JHIGZ SULVU HF LQAUIYU SLAG XLIPLRW HISW GH RUAPRFLYU BOGZ L SOVUR GRLIATSLIG OI XPIU. IHIU HF GZLG, ZHBUVUR, RULSSW JLGGURA. HVUR GZU TLAG 10 WULRA LTTSU'A AGHYK ZLA ROAUI JHRU GZLI 650%. OGA UJTSHWUU ZULD YHPIG RHAU GH 32,000 SLAG WULR FRHJ 8,568 OI AUTGUJQUR HF 2000. LTTSU RHPGOIUSW GHTA GZU TY YLGUNHRW HF GZU LJUROYLI YPAGHJUR ALGOAFLYGOHI OIDUM. FOILSSW, XHQA' LQAUIYU TRHVUD ZU ZLA QPOSG L GULJ GZLG YLI DUSOVUR NHHD RUAPSGA--OF IHG DUGLOSUD PTDLGUA LQHPG ZOA ZULSGZ
This table shows the occurances of the letters in the text (ignoring the case of the letters):
This table shows how the text matches a normal probability to text (where 'E' has the highest level of occurance and 'Z' has the least). The grey rows show what would be expected for the order, and the red one shows what your text gives for the order: